An email signup and Bitcoin deposit can reduce upfront disclosure, but they do not guarantee privacy throughout an account.
What “Anonymous” Means at a Crypto Casino
“Anonymous” is a relative description at a crypto casino, not a promise that a player’s identity can never be established. In practical terms, it usually refers to what is not requested at the point of registration. A no-KYC casino may let someone create an account with an email address and deposit cryptocurrency without first submitting a passport or utility bill. That is less upfront disclosure than a conventional identity-document process, but it does not make every part of the account or payment activity invisible.
For UK players, the distinction matters because offshore crypto casinos can accept wagers in Bitcoin and other digital coins. The word “anonymous” describes a possible route into play: an email address instead of an identity document at signup, and a crypto deposit instead of a conventional payment method. It does not describe a guaranteed condition that continues unchanged through every account action.
There are several separate questions hidden inside the label. What information is requested when the account is opened? What information is linked to the wallet used for payment? What checks may be applied while the account is active? And what might be requested before a withdrawal is released? A site may ask for little at the outset while still retaining the ability to assess activity later. Calling that arrangement anonymous without qualification collapses those stages into one claim.
A crypto payment also should not be treated as a cash transaction with no trail. Digital coins move through public or otherwise traceable payment networks, and the casino receives a transaction associated with a wallet address. The address is not itself a passport name, but that is not the same as proving the funds or activity cannot be connected to other information. The practical distinction is between an identity document being requested during signup and the possibility that account or transaction activity can be examined by other means.
UK Casino Payments: Methods and Options
A specialist review has described forms of “soft KYC” that may involve geolocation, IP addresses, browser or device fingerprinting, on-chain tracing, and monitoring withdrawal behaviour. That description should be read as a report of possible methods, not as a universal checklist used by every casino. It does, however, show why “no documents requested at signup” and “no identity-related assessment at all” are not interchangeable claims. A site can collect or analyse signals without asking for a passport at registration.
The label can therefore be useful only when its scope is made clear. If “anonymous” means that the initial form may require no more than an email address, the claim can describe a limited registration arrangement. If it means that the operator cannot connect activity to a person, will never request documents, or will never review a payment, the claim goes beyond what that signup arrangement establishes.
This is also why “anonymous casino” and “no-KYC casino” are not exact synonyms. The latter is more specific about the identity-check process being advertised, though even that phrase does not settle what may happen after registration. A player can begin without submitting conventional documents and still encounter checks later. The absence of an upfront document upload is a feature of the entry process, not a permanent status attached to the account.
A useful reading of any anonymity claim is therefore narrow: identify what the operator says is required before play begins, and separate that from broader promises about privacy or future checks. “Email registration” answers one question. “Crypto accepted” answers another. Neither statement alone proves complete anonymity. The headline may be brief; the underlying arrangement is not.
Our top casino picks for the UK
- EvoSpinBonus: 125% up to €2500 + 125 Free Spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- ZombillionBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- ChanzeBonus: Slots Welcome Bonus #1 200% up to €500 · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- BritsinoBonus: Welcome Package – Get your £2,200 + 2,000 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- JetsetspinsBonus: 200% Bonus + 100 Free Spins + Free Royal Wheel · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- Revery PlayBonus: 100% up to€1,000+ 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- NightWinBonus: £900 + 400 free spins · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- DieselwinBonus: Welcome Pack 250% up to £4000 + 200 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- BeOnBetBonus: 100% up to €500 + 100 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
- AmunbetBonus: Join now and get 450% up to 2,700 GBP + 450 FS · Payout speed: 1-3 business days
How Offshore Crypto Casinos Differ from UK-Licensed Sites
The practical difference is not simply the payment method. Offshore crypto casinos can accept Bitcoin and other digital coins, but they sit outside the UK Gambling Commission’s oversight. A UK-licensed casino operates within the UK regulatory system; an offshore site does not give its customers the protections attached to that system.
That distinction matters when a transaction goes wrong. A balance displayed on a casino account is not the same as money held under UK-backed safeguards. If an offshore operator delays a withdrawal, closes an account or disputes a balance, there is no UK regulatory process requiring it to resolve the complaint. The operator’s own terms and internal process become the main route for challenging its decision.
Financial Risk
Offshore operators sit outside the UK regulatory system, meaning there is no UK-backed guarantee for recovering balances or resolving disputes.
At a UK-licensed site, regulatory oversight gives customers a formal framework for complaints and dispute resolution. Offshore players do not have access to UK-approved alternative dispute resolution or an ombudsman through the UK system. UK consumer law does not protect them in a dispute with an offshore crypto casino. A complaint can still be made to the operator, but that is not equivalent to an independent body reviewing the outcome.
The financial exposure is broader than a disagreement over a single withdrawal. Playing at an unlicensed offshore casino means forfeiting the UK regulatory protections built around gambling accounts, including protections relating to segregated funds. If the operator becomes insolvent or refuses to pay winnings, there is no UK-backed guarantee that the balance will be recovered. A casino may advertise real-money play, but the advertisement does not make its displayed balance a protected claim.
This is the central trade-off behind anonymous cryptocurrency casinos: access to crypto payments is available offshore, while UK regulatory recourse is not. The two features should not be treated as a package. A site’s ability to accept a digital coin says something about its payment options; it says nothing by itself about how a dispute will be handled or whether winnings will be paid.
That is why lists of the best anonymous online casinos can obscure the decision that matters most. A polished interface, game catalogue or prominent payment logo does not replace oversight. Nor does a claim that a casino is established or popular create UK consumer protection. The financial comparison needs to include the possibility that a disputed balance cannot be escalated through a UK-recognised route.
Casinos that accept Boku in the UK: payment guide
The absence of formal recourse changes the value of every balance held there. On a regulated site, a customer can use the operator’s complaints procedure and, where eligible, pursue an independent dispute route. At an offshore casino, the customer may be left with the operator’s decision and whatever complaint channels exist in the jurisdiction where it is based. Those channels are not a substitute for UK-backed protection, and their practical usefulness may be difficult to assess before a dispute occurs.
A fair comparison therefore separates payment convenience from financial security. Crypto can move between a wallet and a casino without the familiar route of a bank payment, but that does not reduce the consequences of an account dispute. If access to a UK complaints framework, segregated-fund protections or an ombudsman matters, an offshore crypto casino does not offer the equivalent service. The cost of the payment option is partly the loss of those safeguards.
Searches for the best anonymous cryptocurrency casino or top Bitcoin casinos often invite a ranking based on features that are easy to display. The harder question is what happens when the operator and player disagree. Offshore status leaves that question outside UK oversight. Any claimed winnings remain subject to the operator’s terms and willingness to pay; they are not guaranteed by the UK system.
Regulatory Status
A UK-licensed casino offers protection under domestic law, whereas an offshore crypto casino provides a different payment route without those consumer protections.
The comparison is consequently not between two versions of the same product. A UK-licensed casino offers gambling within a domestic regulatory framework, while an offshore crypto casino offers a different payment route without that framework’s consumer protections. The latter may suit someone prioritising cryptocurrency payments, but the exchange is concrete: no UK-backed dispute resolution, no protection under UK consumer law in a dispute, and no assurance that an offshore operator will honour a contested balance.
UK Access: Legal Status and the Licensing Boundary
An offshore casino can be reachable from the UK without being authorised to serve the British market. Those are separate facts. The player’s ability to open a site does not establish that its operator holds the licence required to offer gambling to people in Great Britain.
The UK Gambling Commission regulates gambling in the United Kingdom, including online casino activity. For remote gambling offered to consumers in Great Britain, the operator’s location does not remove the licensing requirement: the relevant question is whether it is serving the British market. In 2026, operators serving British residents are still required to hold a UKGC licence. A licence from another jurisdiction does not substitute for that permission.
This distinction matters for offshore crypto casinos. Some accept players based in the UK and may hold a licence issued elsewhere, but that does not make them UK-licensed. If an operator targets British customers without the required UKGC licence, it is operating outside the UK licensing rules. The regulatory obligation rests on the operator; it is not transferred to the customer simply because the customer can reach the website.
Casinos That Accept POLi in the UK: What to Check
For an individual player, accessing an unlicensed offshore casino is not a criminal offence under the stated UK position. That point should not be stretched into a claim that the casino is authorised, or that the activity is equivalent to gambling with a locally licensed operator. Player liability and operator permission are different questions. A player’s lack of criminal liability does not grant an offshore business the right to serve British residents.
The practical dividing line is therefore not whether a site accepts Bitcoin, whether its pages load in Britain, or whether it describes itself as international. It is whether the operator has the UK Gambling Commission licence required for the service it offers to British customers. A foreign licence may indicate regulation in another jurisdiction, but it does not cross that boundary.
This also rules out presenting a casino as both fully anonymous and UK-licensed. UKGC licensing places the operator inside a regulatory system with customer-facing obligations, including checks connected with who is gambling and whether they are legally permitted to do so. UK-licensed operators must establish customer due diligence before gambling transactions are allowed. A service promising that customers can gamble without the operator establishing their identity is not a sound description of a UK-licensed casino.
That does not mean every website using the words “anonymous” or “no KYC” has been assessed against the same standard. Such wording may describe a signup experience or an offshore operator’s stated policy; it does not prove UK authorisation. Nor does a claim of UK legitimacy become reliable because a site accepts British currency, displays familiar payment options, or is accessible from a UK internet connection. None of those details replaces the licence.
Licensing
Attention A foreign licence does not substitute for a UKGC licence when serving the British market.
The term “anonymous bitcoin casino” can therefore refer to a service that allows access from Britain while remaining outside UKGC oversight. It cannot accurately describe a casino that both offers fully anonymous gambling and holds the UK licence required to serve the British market. Those propositions conflict: the licence entails regulatory duties that prevent the operator from treating the player as wholly unidentified.
The same distinction applies to lists describing the best or leading anonymous casinos. A ranking, badge, or foreign licensing label cannot establish that a listed operator is entitled to target British customers. The relevant status is the UKGC licence, not the strength of the site’s marketing or the convenience of its crypto payments. Without that licence, the operator is not a UK-licensed casino, whatever terminology it uses for its service.
A site’s status should also not be inferred from its technical setup. The UK Gambling Commission’s reach over remote gambling offered to consumers in Great Britain is not determined by where the operator keeps its equipment. Moving servers or corporate operations overseas does not, by itself, remove the obligation to hold the relevant UK licence when serving that market.
The result is a narrow but important legal distinction: a UK player is not committing a criminal offence merely by visiting an unlicensed offshore casino, while an operator targeting British customers without a UKGC licence is acting unlawfully. Access is not authorisation, and the player’s position does not cure the operator’s. For any claim combining UK legitimacy with anonymous crypto gambling, the licensing boundary is the test; the description cannot make both sides true.
Casinos That Accept Giropay in the UK: What to Check
No-KYC Bitcoin Play and the Limits of “No Verification”
A no-KYC Bitcoin casino may let a new account be opened with an email address or a wallet connection, without asking for a passport or proof of address at registration. That is a narrower claim than “no verification”. It describes the entry process, not a permanent exemption from checks.
The distinction matters when an offer is described as an anonymous Bitcoin casino without verification. The wording can suggest that identity documents will never be requested, but a short signup does not establish that. Registration, account use and a later withdrawal can be subject to different conditions. The practical question is not only what the site asks for at the start, but what its terms allow it to request afterwards.
A specialist review reports that some no-KYC casinos may seek identification in cases involving a large withdrawal, suspected suspicious activity, or a change from cryptocurrency to fiat currency. That is a report about possible operator practices, not a universal rule or a promise that every site will act in the same way. The terms of the individual operator determine what it claims the right to do; the label “no verification” does not settle the issue.
This also changes how claims about instant withdrawals should be read. A site may describe its service as requiring no verification at signup, while retaining discretion to review an account before releasing funds. “No verification” and “instant withdrawal” are separate claims. Neither one, by itself, confirms how an account will be handled when a withdrawal is requested.
An advertised no-deposit bonus does not answer the identity question either. The existence of a bonus and the documents an operator may request are separate conditions. Bonus calculations belong to the offer terms; they cannot be treated as evidence that a player will never face an account check.
Verification Triggers
Some no-KYC casinos may still request identification in specific circumstances, such as large withdrawals, suspicious activity, or switching from cryptocurrency to fiat currency.
The same caution applies to lists promoted as the top anonymous crypto casinos with no verification. A ranking label cannot establish that an operator has no later checks. A useful comparison starts with the wording of the account and withdrawal terms, including any clause that permits document requests or account review. If those conditions are unclear, the site’s headline is not a substitute for them.
For UK-based players, the label does not change the licensing boundary: no-KYC claims do not make an offshore casino UK-licensed or restore UK consumer protections. Applicable local laws still need to be considered before using an offshore no-KYC Bitcoin casino. A low-friction opening process is a feature of registration; it is not a guarantee about what happens to an account or its balance later.
No-Deposit Bonuses: The Wagering Arithmetic
A no-deposit offer has no cash value simply because it appears in an account. Its value depends on the amount that can actually be withdrawn after the wagering condition is met. The relevant calculation starts with the bonus, not with the headline attached to it.
A specialist review reports wagering requirements at offshore crypto casinos in the range of 35 to 50 times the bonus. On that basis, a bonus of B requires between 35B and 50B in qualifying bets before withdrawal. The range is a reported offer condition, not a universal tariff: the terms for the specific promotion determine the actual figure. A larger multiplier means more turnover is required for the same bonus.
Casinos That Accept Maestro in the UK: Payment Guide
That turnover is not necessarily counted across every game. A specialist review notes that some casino bonuses exclude live games from wagering. If live games do not contribute, bets placed there may leave the outstanding requirement unchanged. A promotion that appears flexible can therefore be narrower in practice than the game catalogue suggests. The eligible-game list and contribution rates matter as much as the multiplier.
The maximum permitted bet during wagering also changes the calculation. A specialist review reports that this cap can be as low as £5. A low ceiling restricts how quickly a player can accumulate qualifying turnover, while exceeding it may put bonus funds or related winnings at risk under the offer terms. The cap should be checked before play, not inferred from the ordinary table or slot limits displayed elsewhere.
A useful comparison is therefore not “bonus offered” but “cash potentially withdrawable after qualifying turnover.” The terms need to identify the wagering base, eligible games, contribution rates, maximum bet, expiry conditions and any withdrawal cap. If the operator does not state how a condition is applied, its practical cost cannot be calculated from the headline alone.
The no-deposit label removes the initial payment; it does not remove the price of the conditions. Where a bonus requires substantial turnover, excludes preferred games or imposes a restrictive bet cap, the expected cash value may be low even if the promotional amount looks attractive. Without clear terms, the offer has no reliably measurable value.
Wagering Reality
The value of a no-deposit bonus depends on meeting specific turnover requirements and adhering to game restrictions.
Offshore promotions also sit outside UK regulatory protection. A dispute over whether wagering was completed does not come with UK-backed formal dispute resolution, and winnings are not assured. That risk belongs in the same calculation as the bonus conditions: a balance shown on screen is not equivalent to cash available for withdrawal.
How to Assess a Bitcoin Casino Without a “Best Sites” List
A ranking of anonymous Bitcoin casinos can make unlike offers look comparable. The useful comparison is narrower: what the site accepts, what it requires to start, and what protection remains if a payment or account dispute occurs. A label such as “best” does not change those terms.
For a UK-based player, the first distinction is whether the casino operates offshore. Crypto casinos in that category sit outside UK Gambling Commission oversight. They do not provide UK-backed consumer protection or formal dispute resolution. UK consumer law does not protect players in a dispute with such an operator, and there is no access to a UK alternative dispute resolution service or ombudsman. UK regulatory protections, including dispute resolution and segregated-funds safeguards, are forfeited; winnings are not guaranteed.
That exposure should carry more weight than a polished site or a wide game catalogue. A comparison that ranks operators but leaves out the absence of UK recourse is measuring presentation, not the financial terms that matter. Where a payment is held or a balance is contested, a UK regulator cannot supply the missing complaint route.
Casinos That Accept NeoSurf in the UK
The entry cost also needs to be read as a condition, not a recommendation. One specialist review puts offshore crypto-casino minimum deposits at around the equivalent of £10. That is a reported figure, not a fixed market tariff: the amount and accepted coin can differ between operators. A low threshold limits the cash committed at the outset, but it does not reduce the loss of consumer protection or make a disputed balance easier to recover.
A practical assessment can therefore be made without naming a “best” site. Establish whether the operator is offshore; note the minimum deposit and the currency in which it is stated; then weigh that entry cost against the lack of UK-backed remedies. A list of casino sites may help identify offers, but it cannot turn an offshore service into a UK-protected one.
The phrase “best anonymous Bitcoin casino” bundles together convenience and safety as if they were one measure. They are not. The relevant decision is whether the stated deposit terms justify using a service that sits outside the UK system, with no formal UK dispute process if the account or funds become contested. Check the laws applicable to the place of access before using an offshore casino.
Bitcoin Casino Signup: Email, Wallet, and the Anonymity Trade-Off
A no-KYC Bitcoin casino may reduce signup to an email address or a connection to a cryptocurrency wallet. The route varies by operator: an email-based form creates an account using an address, while a wallet connection links the account to the wallet used for deposits. Neither method requires the same information as a conventional form that asks for a passport or utility bill at registration.
Email Registration
Creates an account using an email address instead of identity documents.
Wallet Connection
Links the account directly to the cryptocurrency wallet used for deposits.
Identity Documents
Conventional forms that require a passport or utility bill at registration.
Some no-KYC casinos allow cryptocurrency deposits without those documents being submitted during signup. That is a feature of the registration process, not proof that every account remains document-free at every stage. The distinction matters when comparing claims about Bitcoin casino signup: “email only” describes an initial step, while a promise of permanent anonymity would be a much broader claim.
The practical trade-off is between fewer details supplied upfront and a thinner account trail at the casino. An email account remains an identifier, and a connected wallet is not the same thing as having no transaction record. A wallet connection also does not remove the need to understand which address is being used or what permissions the connection requests. Registration simplicity is not a substitute for checking the operator’s terms.
The word “best” adds little to this comparison unless the conditions are specified. A short form may save time, but it says nothing by itself about the handling of deposits, account access or a later dispute. For a useful assessment, the relevant question is what signup actually asks for, whether a wallet connection is optional, and what the operator says about account requirements after registration.
UK residents should also check the laws that apply before using an offshore no-KYC Bitcoin casino. An offshore operator does not provide UK-backed consumer protection; UK consumer law does not protect a player in a dispute with such a casino, and there is no UK dispute-resolution route through an ombudsman or approved alternative dispute resolution. A minimal signup can reduce the information supplied at the start. It cannot improve those protections.
Casinos That Accept Revolut in the UK: Payment Guide
Crypto Withdrawals: Processing Time Is Not the Same as Arrival Time
An advertised instant crypto withdrawal can refer to the casino releasing a payment after its own review, not to the funds appearing in the receiving wallet. These are separate stages, controlled by different systems. The casino must approve and send the transaction; the relevant blockchain must then confirm it.
Specialist casino reviews describe crypto withdrawals as being sent instantly once an operator’s internal review is complete. Those reviews put the review at trusted operators at under an hour, but neither interval is a universal service standard. A pending request has not yet reached the blockchain, so its arrival time cannot be assessed from the casino’s processing claim alone.
After broadcast, confirmation depends on the coin and network conditions. A specialist review gives Bitcoin confirmation times of 10–30 minutes and Litecoin confirmation times of a few minutes. These are reported timings, not a promise for an individual transaction. Network congestion, the fee attached to a transaction and the number of confirmations required can affect when a wallet treats funds as available.
The first withdrawal may add another stage. Specialist reviews report that an initial payout can receive a manual review lasting a few hours. That is an operator-side delay, not a blockchain delay; the network clock starts only after the transaction has been sent. Later withdrawals may follow a different process, so a quick payout does not establish a fixed timetable for every request.
A useful comparison is therefore not simply “instant” against “slow”. It is whether the stated time covers internal approval, transmission, or final confirmation in the receiving wallet. If those stages are not separated, the headline describes only part of the journey. A casino’s instant-processing claim cannot make a Bitcoin transaction confirm instantly, and a fast network confirmation cannot shorten a request still waiting for casino approval.
Does ‘processed’ mean the funds have arrived?
No, ‘processed’ may simply mean the casino has sent the payment; it does not guarantee the receiving wallet has credited it.
Why is there a delay in withdrawals?
Delays can be caused by internal operator reviews or blockchain confirmation times, which are distinct stages.
The practical measure is the time from requesting withdrawal to seeing confirmed funds, with the operator’s review and blockchain confirmation treated as distinct intervals. A displayed status such as “processed” may mean the casino has sent the payment; it does not necessarily mean the receiving wallet has credited it.
When a Casino Can Still Ask for ID
“No verification” describes a signup or payment route, not a binding promise that identification will never be requested. A specialist review reports that some no-KYC casinos may ask for ID when a withdrawal is large, activity appears suspicious, or a player switches from cryptocurrency to fiat. These are reported triggers, not a universal policy: the operator’s terms determine what checks it can require and when.
That distinction matters at the point funds leave the account. A player may deposit and wager in cryptocurrency without submitting a passport or utility bill, yet encounter a request for documents before a withdrawal is released. The absence of an upfront document check therefore does not establish that every later transaction will be handled without one.
Converting winnings to pounds through a cryptocurrency exchange creates a separate verification point. Exchanges bring KYC back into the withdrawal process; a casino’s minimal signup does not remove the exchange’s identity checks. The route is therefore not simply “casino to bank”: it can include an identity-controlled conversion stage between the crypto balance and spendable sterling.
The regulatory process is different at a UK-licensed operator. Such operators must complete customer due diligence before allowing gambling transactions. That is not equivalent to an offshore no-KYC signup followed by a possible later request; it places checks before gambling begins.
For an offshore account, the practical question is not only whether ID is requested at registration. It is whether the terms explain what can trigger a later check, what documents may be required, and how a crypto-to-fiat withdrawal is handled. If those conditions are unclear, the amount shown in the account is not necessarily an amount that can be converted and withdrawn without further steps.
Casinos That Accept AstroPay in the UK: What to Check
Bitcoin, Other Coins, and the Value That Reaches the Account
An offshore casino may allow a UK player to wager in Bitcoin or another digital coin. That describes the unit used for play; it does not fix what the balance is worth in pounds. A coin balance can remain unchanged while its sterling value moves, so the amount shown in the account and the amount represented by that balance are not the same measure.
The distinction matters across the full transaction. A deposit has a sterling value when the coin is sent. If the exchange rate changes before the funds are wagered, the same coin quantity represents a different amount in pounds. The value can move again before withdrawal. A payout matching the original coin amount therefore does not necessarily restore the original sterling value.
This is a separate risk from the result of a bet. A player can finish with the same number of coins deposited and still have a different pound value because the market price changed. Equally, a coin balance can rise in sterling terms without any additional winnings. Measuring only the coin quantity hides both outcomes.
For an anonymous cryptocurrency casino, the useful comparison is not just the displayed balance. It is the sterling value at deposit and at the point funds are converted or spent, with the possibility of movement between those points kept in view. A displayed coin amount is not a fixed cash equivalent.
Bitcoin and other digital coins make it possible to wager without using pounds as the account’s working unit. They do not remove price exposure. Cryptocurrency values can fluctuate significantly, affecting the value of both deposited and withdrawn funds. That movement can leave the final sterling amount higher or lower even when the number of coins is unchanged.
Is it legal to play at an anonymous crypto casino in the UK?
Yes, playing at an unlicensed offshore casino is not a criminal offence for an individual in the UK. However, these casinos operate without a UKGC licence and do not provide UK-backed consumer protection or formal dispute resolution.
Are No KYC Bitcoin Casinos Safe?
They do not carry the protections of a UK-licensed casino. If an offshore operator delays a withdrawal, disputes your balance or becomes insolvent, there is no UK-backed guarantee or formal UK dispute process to recover your funds.
Are no KYC casinos genuinely anonymous?
No, not necessarily. Registration may require only an email address or wallet connection, but a casino may later assess activity or request ID, and checks can involve signals such as IP addresses, device data and transaction tracing.
Can I play with Bitcoin without providing any ID?
Some offshore no-KYC casinos allow registration and Bitcoin deposits without an upfront passport or utility-bill submission. They may still request ID later, for example for a large withdrawal, suspicious activity or a switch from crypto to fiat.
What is the fastest withdrawal method at UK online casinos?
At UK-licensed casinos, e-wallet withdrawals are processed within 24 hours. UK players cannot use UKGC-licensed operators offering cryptocurrency withdrawals.
